How original: the Obama regime labels Mitt Romney’s Vice-presidential pick as “radical” and “extreme.” You cannot go one day without some Democrat describing a conservative as “radical and extreme.” They always go to this tired tactic from an old playbook. They are out of ideas and cannot creatively or accurately describe their opponents. The fact is that the Democrats have not had an original idea since Karl Marx.
Two thumbs up for Romney’s VP pick. I like how Ryan’s speech at the Nauticus Museum in Norfolk, Virginia was ideological. This election is not simply about different policy choices. It is about two antithetical ideas of what America is.
One idea is that America is a tool for a collectivist, egalitarian utopia where no one owns any more than anyone else and the “poor” are taken care on the backs of the working class. It is a place where “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” is the motto.
The other idea is an America as a land of liberty, where our rights are given to us by God, where our national motto is still “In God We Trust,” where equal opportunity is guaranteed, not equal outcomes, where private property and success is celebrated and defended, where ingenuity, innovation, and hard work are rewarded.
There is a clear choice this election:
Obama’s collectivist America based on a secular humanist religion or an America based on its Judeo-Christian founding principles.
I am begining to wonder if liberals who call every conservative idea: pro-life, lower taxation, fewer welfare plans or tighter guidelines, having to prove youre allowed to vote in order to do so, etc. is actually “extreme”, or they just say that to scare people into voting for democrats. If its just rhetoric, it is successful, to a degree. I run into people who do believe Romney didnt pay taxes for 10 years and argue it like it is a well established fact. Or that Romney closed the plant and that guy’s wife died because of Romney.
What do you think, do they believe conservativism is extreme, or is it just rhetorical trickery for votes? I’m guessing it’s a mix of the two, and it really speaks to how little they think of their base’s intelligence or drive to fact check
I believe that it is more trickery than anything they really believe. Democrats thrive in immorality. They don’t care if they are lying. They shun truth or they’d be conservative. They may have shunned truth long enough to actually think what they belive is true. But they say things without caring as to whether they are true, only how it will affect the hearer.
[...] Democrat of any consequence to appear on any conservative radio program during their convention. Bankrupt of ideas and short on the truth, Democrats are afraid to be confronted with level-headed, [...]